Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - Custom Code Management
Viewing all 731 articles
Browse latest View live

ATC not checking code in user exit includes

$
0
0

Dear Friends,

 

I'm not sure if you have faced this issue, but I have not found anyone or any post or any document or any OSS note talking about it.

 

I've recently have realized than when using ATC for checking the custom code of an Z include it was finding cero errors when it was actually full of them.

 

In fact using code inspector, the errors where found. It was not an issue of using a different variant, this was checked, CI and ATC are using the same,

 

The issue itself was clear: When the ATC checks a parent object its checks the code of its includes. If you try to check an include directly with ATC, it is ignored with message "No checks are available for the objects types", giving the chance to "add master program" so it will be checked when the master program is checked with all its includes. Last, ATC neither Code Inspector checks custom code.

 

The end result is that when trying to check the code in a user exit include with ATC it does not find any error.

 

I can think about encapsulating the code found in a user exits but this is a titanic task.

 

The main problem is that the jobs for getting in CCLM the quality required massive ATC runs that will not catch the errors in these kind of objects.

 

Have you face this issue? do you have any recommendation?

 

I would like your opinion before raising this as customer message, as from my point of this this may require a SAP correction.

 

Thanks

Aubin


iCI Dashboard - CSRF Token Missing

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

I am facing an issue with my iCI Dashboard on my production solution manager.  When drilling down from any of the top level custom code headings I get the following message.

 

iCI Dashboard CSRF Missing.jpg

I have debugged this and it appears that the CSRF token is not generated and hence it cannot be found.

 

Any one else had this issue? I've taken a look at the iCI Wiki page but unfortunately this particular scenario is not there. It does describe forcing the check but since the token is not even generated, this will not help.

 

Thanks

Ian

UPL Activated in Managed Systems - Now What?

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

First post for me in the UPL SCN. I believe I have correctly activated UPL data collection in our managed ABAP Systems. (Followed this link to do so: https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~sapidb1000358700000427102012E)

 

I can run the sa38 report /SDF/UPL_CONTROL and it shows that is in on and working. Also report /SDF/SHOW_UPL will show me a bunch of returned data when I click execute. (these are being ran on the abap systems themselves).

 

My question is, now what? Where do I go inside solution manager to begin seeing if this data is being stored in the SolMan BW? Any insight, work center locations, reports or anything else will help.


Thanks,

Zach

Scope and Effort Analysis failed due to Similarity Data is too old

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am trying to generate Scope and Effort Analysis Report for EhP deployment of an ERP system. However, the analysis failed; in the Processing Log, the step "Provide Similarity (Clone Finder) data"  shows "Similarity Data is too old".

 

What should I do in this situation? Is there any possibility to bypass this step?

 

Best regards,

Duy BPS Finland

Migrating UPL Data

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

I have historical data in my 0SM_UPL cube from when CCLM was configured using SP9 against my ECC system last year. Now I am about to reconfigure using SP12, I wanted to know whether the UPL migration would be triggered if no UPL extractor was currently running (it stopped for unknown reasons a couple of months ago).  I have taken a look at the WDA code for the migration step and it suggests to me that the old UPL extractor is checked if it is running before performing the migration.

 

Thanks

Ian

CDMC statistic collection activation - UPL deactivated error

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am trying to activate the statistic collection in CDMC for my staging system through Solman, but one of my system showing below error " UPL Deactivated" .

 

BN1.png

So i am trying to activate the UPL from CCLM setup in solution manager, but UPL & ATC option are greyed out.

Extractor activation.png

Also i checked the  note1922412  UPL extractor flag fix for this fix, but this note shows " Cannot be implemented" status.

 

Currently i am using SAP Solution Manager 7.1 SP12 version.

 

Rg,

Karthik

TextEdit UI element Enable/Disable for User input Dynamically Webdynpro

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have an TextEdit UI element in my Output and this needs to be Enable/Disable for User input Dynamically based on a condition. Buy default it will be enabled for user input.

 

 

As CL_WD_TEXT_EDIT is a protected class, I have created custom class as a sub class of CL_WD_TEXT_EDIT and tried SET_ENABLED and SET_DISPLAY_ONLY both the methods. But it's not working for me.

 

Please suggest is there any way to achieve the same.

 

Thanks,

Viswanath

There is no app which can be added to this dashboard

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

When i am trying to add Custom Code App in solution manager, i get an error 'There is no app which can be added to this dashboard'. I could not find any info on how to fix this error.

Does you have any idea on this error?

Custom_Code_app_error.png

thanks

Sai


Extractor Framework: Custom Code Library Extractor (new) and City Extractor dumps

$
0
0


Hello,

we are currently in Setup phase of CCLM after SP12 Upgrade and have also implemented all proposed notes from RTCCTOOL. After activating the cubes and step 6 of solman_setup our Custom Code Library Extractor and the Custom Code City Extractor are Dumping with the follwing error:

 

Custom Code Library Extractor (new): "Error occurred"

Custom Code City Extractor: "No Custom Code Objects fournd for SYSID in CCLM"

Custom_Code_Extractor.jpg

We want to perform Setup for 3 System Landscapes for the first trial. We also had the Version of previously ServicePacks up and running.

 

Can you give me a hint? I did not find this error description in the Custom Code Management Roadmap for SP12+.

Thank you.

Problem Overview CCLM "no data"

$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are implementing CCLM on Solman SP13.

We followed the configuration guide, all extractors are working fine and we do not have any authorization issues.

When we launch transaction "CCLM", we do not have any data on the "overview" part.

All other parts (library, decommissioning...) are showing data correctly.

We are using IE 10 or 11 and we also tried with chrome and firefox but the issue remains.

Do you have any idea where this problem could come from?

 

2015-08-31_173616.png

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Louise Bariohay.

UPL Migration Report RAGS_CC_UPL_HK_MIG_SETTINGS

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have one question regarding this new Report.

 

We were using UPL before we upgraded to the multicube infrastructure. Now wer are trying to migrate data from the day cube to the other three UPLCubes with the Report mentioned above.

The Option we have chosen is : "Trigger Migration to all three cubes" which should check uncondensed requests in the day cube which are not yet in the other Infocubes.

We scheduled this Job in expectation that this will migrate all the daily data to the yearly cube also. The Job runs perfect for the monthly and weekly cube. For the yearly one it takes days to get only 10% migrated.

Is there a possibility to improve Performance on this? Is there another option how we could schedule this Job to get the Migration to the yearly cube done?

 

Thank you in advance.

Best regards

Manuela Graf

Custom Code Library Extractor - FM AGS_CC_CCLM_EXTRACT

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

Just debugging this extractor FM and noticed that all the usage values were 0.  Looking at the code, it dawned on me that the  lv_last_usg_day,  lv_last_usg_week,  lv_last_usg_month,  lv_last_usg_year are not set which is probably why.

 

AGS_CC_CCLM_EXTRACT.png

 

Is there an OSS note for this as I cannot currently find one.

 

Thanks

Ian

How to enable the ATC in the Solman

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Currently i am working in ATC setup in Solution manager, I have checked the below blogs for the same.

 

Getting Started with the ABAP Test Cockpit for QMs and Admins

 

 

Completed the CCLM setup for required managed systems and activated ATC extractor.

 

I have below quires to push the ATC details option

 

1. Whether i need to execute the ATC t.code in Solution manager system or managed system or both.

2.  Which System ID is need to maintain in the master system

3. What is the RFC ( TMW or Trusted or needs to created new RFC)

ATC.png

4. How to pull the ATC data to solution manager.

    Whetehr i need to execute the belwo transfer setup in Solution manager or managed system or both

Push data.png

 

Please provide some idea for the above setup.

 

Rg,

Karthik

Analysis jobs in the managed system for CCLM does not run properly

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

As a part of CCLM configuration we have scheduled Analysis jobs to run in the managed system.

UPL jobs is running successfully.

But 2 jobs, Custom code Refrences and Custom code Similarity though indicates the job is finished successfully, the results are not as expected.

 

Below is the initial analysis carried out by me where i could not identify the cause of the issue.

Did anyone face same issues?

 

thanks

Sai

 

Initial Analysis:

 

We  are configuring CCLM in solution manager SOD system, client 100

In step 6.3, Schedule Analysis Jobs, we have scheduled analysis jobs in PDS (managed) system and client 801

But the jobs don’t run correctly.

  1. Job /SDF/CC_REFERENCES

 

Job shows that it is completed successful but the job log mentions error

 

Job log does not indicate that the job completed successfully. This is misleading.

Could not find any note the SAP Market place with similar error.

 

Can you please advise on removing the error?

 

  1. Job EFWK ANALYSIS JOB FOR SIMILARITY completes successfully

There exists data in managed system PDS

But, if we check for the similarity details, in SOD:100 using report RAGS_CC_REPORTING, the result contains no data.

Number of records found ‘0’

Extractor for custom code similarity is also active

But looks like no data is fetched into solution manager SOD.

Can anyone please check and advise.

Issue with field ZUONR and SGTXT not populated in reversal posting docoment

$
0
0

When we create the payment posting documents for a check payment for a employee we can see the fields ZUONR and SGTXT in the document created but while running reversal in offcycle workbench and subsequent activities using process model for reversal the document generated for payment posting are missing fields ZUONR and SGTXT.

 

Is there a Badi that needs to be implemented that can help populate  fields ZUONR (assignment) and SGTXT (text) in the document.

 

We tried to look at the Badi SMOD_PCPO0001 but it seems to get triggered only during payment processing not during reversal.

 

what is happening

2.png

 

what we expect

 

1.png


Benchmark about Customer code Cost and Customer code Obsolescence

$
0
0

Do anyone have a Benchmark or personal statistics about customer code cost? (how much the
Custom Code cost to be build and maintain over the years including upgrade cost)

Do anyone have a Benchmark about how the customer code is getting obsolete over the time? For instance
how many z-code become obsolete over the year; 10% per year 30% after each
upgrade??.

 

Any information that you can share could be useful to me.

 

Sergio Soccal

Engineering  Architect /TQM I SAP Global Service & Support

Chile - SAP Región Sur

Rosario Norte 100 piso 13 |Las Condes | Santiago | Chile

T +56 2 2440 3614 I  M +56 9 99973859

mailto:sergio.soccal@sap.com

CCLM doesn't take into account my system data ?

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I try to configure the CCLM tool on our Solman (7.1 SP12).

 

In order to display the Quality measures IN CCLM, i've activated ATC tool.

ATC.PNG

My current active run contains several errors, but in CCLM tool I only the last active run (with only 1 error).

All extractors are correctly set-up.

 

CCLM.PNG

 

Why CCLM doesn't take into account the ATC result ?

As you can see, i've also problem with Custom Code counter (at the left top of the screen).

 

Last question about Criticality health factor. Extractor generates an error :

 

Criticality.PNG

 

Do you have any idea about these problems ?

 

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Custom Code References

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

Quick question(s) this:  Should the /SDF/CC_REFERENCES job be running in the managed production system and should the CC Ref extractor be triggered for the production managed system?

 

Currently I only have the Object, UPL and a custom extractor running for my production managed systems and my housekeeping trigger job is failing due to the table CCREF Input table being empty.

 

Thanks

Ian

ATC not checking code in user exit includes

$
0
0

Dear Friends,

 

I'm not sure if you have faced this issue, but I have not found anyone or any post or any document or any OSS note talking about it.

 

I've recently have realized than when using ATC for checking the custom code of an Z include it was finding cero errors when it was actually full of them.

 

In fact using code inspector, the errors where found. It was not an issue of using a different variant, this was checked, CI and ATC are using the same,

 

The issue itself was clear: When the ATC checks a parent object its checks the code of its includes. If you try to check an include directly with ATC, it is ignored with message "No checks are available for the objects types", giving the chance to "add master program" so it will be checked when the master program is checked with all its includes. Last, ATC neither Code Inspector checks custom code.

 

The end result is that when trying to check the code in a user exit include with ATC it does not find any error.

 

I can think about encapsulating the code found in a user exits but this is a titanic task.

 

The main problem is that the jobs for getting in CCLM the quality required massive ATC runs that will not catch the errors in these kind of objects.

 

Have you face this issue? do you have any recommendation?

 

I would like your opinion before raising this as customer message, as from my point of this this may require a SAP correction.

 

Thanks

Aubin

TextEdit UI element Enable/Disable for User input Dynamically Webdynpro

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have an TextEdit UI element in my Output and this needs to be Enable/Disable for User input Dynamically based on a condition. Buy default it will be enabled for user input.

 

 

As CL_WD_TEXT_EDIT is a protected class, I have created custom class as a sub class of CL_WD_TEXT_EDIT and tried SET_ENABLED and SET_DISPLAY_ONLY both the methods. But it's not working for me.

 

Please suggest is there any way to achieve the same.

 

Thanks,

Viswanath

Viewing all 731 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>